For security engineers: no more screenshots.

Evidence requests pull engineers away from real work. TruOps reads control status straight from your tools, and its AI works alongside yours to write control tests, remediation steps, and new integrations.

Your agent, working with TruOps AIneeds your approval
1,214tests run this week
0screenshots requested
38tests written by AI
1finding for 50 servers
your-agent → TruOps: "Write a test that every production S3 bucket blocks public access, and run it daily."
Drafted test S3 public access blocked for 214 buckets tagged env=prod, daily at 03:00. It counts toward SOC 2 CC6.1, ISO 27001 A.8.3, and PCI DSS 1.4. A dry run found 2 buckets failing, and I drafted one finding with the fix. Approve the test to start it.
[1] AWS connector · read-only role
[2] Control library · verified AWS tests
[3] Dry run · 214 buckets, 2 failing
AcceptEditReject
Illustrative example. Tests and fixes run only after a person approves them.

For security engineers, TruOps reads control status directly from cloud, identity, endpoint, vulnerability, and code tools on a schedule, groups the same failure across many assets into one finding with a recommended fix, and tracks progress as each asset is fixed.

This is for you if
  • Audit season means screenshot duty
  • Scanner output turns into a flood of tickets
  • You already run AWS, Okta, CrowdStrike, Tenable, and GitHub

What the job asks of you

  • Stop taking screenshots for auditors.
  • Fix root causes, and skip the ticket queue.
  • See which controls matter for which frameworks.
  • Automate compliance work with the same AI tools you already use.

The challenge

Engineers already run the systems that hold the truth. Asking for a screenshot of the Okta policy, or opening fifty tickets for one failed control, is why engineering teams see compliance as a tax. Findings are tracked in TruOps today.

  • A screenshot is wrong the next time someone changes a policy.
  • Tenable or Qualys opened a ticket for every host.
  • Closing the ticket didn't re-check the control.

What you're probably using today

Engineers already run the systems of record, and GRC asks them to retype it all.

What you use nowWhere it falls shortWith TruOps
Screenshot requests in ticketsThe configuration changed after the screenshot was taken.Connectors check the control, and engineers see grouped findings in place of fifty tickets.
SOC 2 automation toolsGreat for getting certified, with automated tests, a big framework library, and often a trust center. Maturity scoring, custom frameworks, and deeper risk or vendor work can fall outside what they cover.Keep your automated checks. Use any framework as your anchor, map the rest with partial overlaps clearly marked, and run vendor and risk work in the same place. Start with the policies and reports you already have.
Jira as the place remediation gets trackedThe finding in GRC and the ticket in Jira drift apart. Ticketing sync is on our roadmap, and findings are tracked in TruOps today.One finding per cause, progress by asset, and a re-check before it closes.

What this role works on

Here's what this role is responsible for, and what good looks like when a board, examiner, auditor, or engineer asks.

Use caseWhat good looks like
Evidence straight from the toolMFA, encryption, branch protection, and similar checks read from identity, cloud, and code tools on a schedule, with every timestamped result stored
One finding, many assetsFifty servers failing the same control become one finding with a recommended fix, and you can see progress as each asset is fixed
Re-checked before it closesA fix counts as done once the next check passes
AI that builds with youDescribe a test, a fix, or an integration, and TruOps AI drafts it for you to review and run
Which controls you ownSee how each GitHub or Okta check maps to SOC 2, ISO, or 800-171, so you only gather evidence for the frameworks you're responsible for

How TruOps helps

  • Connectors to AWS, Azure, GCP, Entra ID, Okta, Intune, Defender, CrowdStrike, Tenable, Qualys, GitHub, and Azure DevOps.
  • Findings grouped by control and cause, with progress tracked by asset.
  • Evidence captured automatically with every check.
  • Ask TruOps AI to write a control test, a fix, or a new integration, and review it before it runs.
  • Call TruOps from your own agents and scripts through the API and webhooks.

Questions

Can our own AI agents work with TruOps?

Yes. Your agents and scripts can call TruOps through the API and webhooks to read control status, open findings, or ask TruOps AI to draft a test or a fix. Anything it drafts waits for a person to approve.

Does a passing check close the finding?

The finding stays open until every affected asset is fixed and the control is re-checked. Nothing closes just because someone said it's done.

Will findings open in Jira?

Not yet. Findings are tracked in TruOps today, grouped by cause, with progress by asset. Ticketing sync is coming, and it's listed that way on our vision page.

Do we have to rip out the tools we already use?

No. TruOps connects to your cloud, identity, endpoint, vulnerability, and code tools. Spreadsheets, prior reports, and policies upload into the Data Room. If you're moving from a SOC 2 automation tool or an enterprise GRC suite, you bring over your frameworks, evidence, vendors, and risks.

See it run on your own data.

Book 30 minutes with a GRC specialist. Bring a real document, like a SOC 2 report, risk register, or vendor list (redacted is fine), and we'll show TruOps AI working on it.